Nathaniel Heintz James and Marilyn Simons Professor
Our research is aimed at the identification of molecular mechanisms
that control development and dysfunction of the mammalian cerebellum. We
have chosen to study the cerebellum because it is a complex and highly
stereotyped structure in which major pattern formation and functional
organization occur postnatally. During the past century, classical
neuroanatomical studies have very precisely described the complex events
that must occur for formation of this brain structure, providing what might
be considered as the most detailed information available concerning the
development of a given brain region. An extensive literature has documented
the importance of cell-cell interactions in the development and maintenance
of normal cerebellar architecture, although the mechanisms mediating these
interactions remain unknown. Identification of these mechanisms, and
analysis of their functions throughout the central nervous system (CNS),
are major priorities of the Heintz laboratory.
One strategy for investigation of molecular mechanisms controlling
cerebellar development is the isolation and investigation of specific genes
that mark critical events in its formation. During the past several years,
we have completed a comprehensive screen to identify cDNAs that are
precisely regulated during the specification and differentiation of
particular cerebellar neurons and glia. These molecules provide a direct
avenue for the investigation of cell:cell signaling events that play a
critical role in this process. Furthermore, in most cases the strict
temporal and spatial regulation of these genes portends a very specific
functional role for their products in cerebellar development. A second
approach toward understanding molecular events that are crucial in
cerebellar formation and function is provided by the analysis of neurologic
mutant mouse strains in which specific cerebellar neurons degenerate as a
consequence of the disease. We have utilized both of these avenues to begin
to dissect complex developmental pathways that play a role in development
of the brain.
Granule Cell Specification in the Developing Brain. The
generation of specific neuronal cell types in the developing brain is a
critical issue. Although very little is known concerning molecules that
control cell specification in the mammalian central nervous system,
precedent from other organisms and from the development of other mammalian
organs has established the role of cell type specific transcription factors
in these processes. During the past year, we have discovered a mammalian
zinc finger transcription factor (Ru49) with characteristics that suggest a
role for this protein in the establishment of granule cell lineages in the
mammalian brain. We have determined that Ru49 possesses a novel DNA binding
specificity, that functional Ru49 is present in the developing nervous
system, and that it is expressed in cerebellar granule cells from their
birth at the rhombic lip throughout their complex differentiation program,
remaining evident in mature granule cells in the adult cerebellum. This
factor is also expressed in the olfactory and dentate gyrus granule cell
lineages, labeling both their earliest precursors within the neural tube
and remaining expressed in the fully mature neurons. These results suggest
a role for Ru49 in specification of these three cell types in the
developing brain.
Neural Differentiation in the Developing Cerebellum. The
differentiation of specific cell types in the cerebellum requires complex
molecular subprograms that provide distinct functions for differentiating
cells. Many of these functions are generally important for neuronal
differentiation, being shared by different cell types to accomplish a given
task. One example of such a subroutine is glial guided neuronal migration,
which is necessary for the translocation of many different neurons from
their place of birth in the neural tube to the eventual sites of their
maturation in the developing brain. During the past year, studies in our
laboratory and in collaboration with Dr. Mary E.
Hatten of The Rockefeller
University, have yielded important insights into this problem. Previous
studies in our laboratories have established that the brain lipid binding
protein (BLBP) is critical for the differentiation of primary glial cells
in vitro, and that this protein is produced in radial glial cells
only during the period of neuronal migration. During the past year, we have
identified a transcriptional regulatory element that is critical for the
regulation of BLBP transcription in radial cells in vivo, and have
shown that this same element can program expression of the BLBP gene in
glial cells in primary culture only if differentiating neurons are present.
These results suggest that the dynamic regulation of BLBP expression in
vivo, and hence radial glial function, is a consequence of neuron:glial
interactions that maintain glial differentiation. Additional studies have
led to the cloning of the mouse astrotactin gene, to its identification as
a novel neuron specific signaling molecule, and to the demonstration that
it is involved in migration and assembly of differentiating neurons into
cortical structures of the mammalian brain. This work, and additional
studies of other molecules important for cellular differentiation in the
developing cerebellum, remain an important priority in the laboratory.
(These studies are partially supported by the National Institutes of
Health.)
Cerebellar Dysfunction: Positional Cloning of Murine Neurologic
Mutant Genes. A second area of investigation in the Heintz laboratory
is the identification of genes responsible for mouse neurologic diseases.
The phenotypes of strains carrying these mutations identify the affected
genes as essential for either normal cerebellar development, or for its
maintenance in mature animals. For example, the Lurcher (Lc) mutation
results in degeneration and death of essentially all cerebellar Purkinje
cells commencing ~10 days after birth. Detailed analysis of the molecular
events underlying Purkinje cell death in Lc mice strongly suggests that
these cells die by the process of apoptosis. It is our hope that
identification of the Lc mutation will provide fundamental insights into
the ectopic activation of programmed cell death in inherited
neurodegenerative diseases. During the past year, we have completed
detailed genetic and physical mapping of the Lc mutation, and have
constructed a YAC contig spanning this locus. A single YAC clone containing
the Lc gene and the four closest recombination break points spanning it has
been isolated, and is presently being utilized to select cerebellar cDNAs
as possible candidates for the Lc gene. Similar studies of the meander tail
(in collaboration with Dr. Colin Fletcher, National Cancer Institute) and
nervous mutations are also being pursued in the Heintz laboratory.
Control of Gene Expression during the Cell Cycle. Dr. Heintz's
laboratory has established that transcriptional induction of histone gene
expression involves coordinate activation of a set of transcription factors
(Oct1, H1TF2, H1TF1,H4TF2) that interact with subtype specific consensus
sequences within the histone gene promoters. These sequences, and their
cognate DNA binding proteins, are critical for cell cycle regulation of
this gene family. Recent studies in the Heintz laboratory have established
that the histone gene transcription factors undergo a complex program of
phosphorylation during the cell cycle that eventually leads to their
inactivation in mitosis. However, no direct modification of these proteins
has yet been found that could explain histone gene transcriptional
induction at the beginning of S phase.
During the past year, the laboratory has concentrated on identifying
proteins that interact with the H2b transcription factor Oct1 and the H1
transcription factor H1TF2. Although these two transcription factors are
both involved in cell cycle regulation, their primary structure and
biochemical properties are entirely different. Present efforts focus on
biochemical characterization of proteins associated with these
transcription factors in vitro, and immunoprecipitation studies of
factors interacting with Oct1 and H1TF2 in vivo, in efforts to
identify a common cofactor that might participate in coordinate control of
S phase specific transcription. The discovery of a mechanism for
transcriptional regulation of histone gene expression during S phase can
provide important insights into control of progression through the
mammalian cell cycle.
|